ArchivesFebruary 2016 - 3E Strategies

Is Development Really Progress?

February 29th, 2016

Here is a thoughtful piece from my colleague Yannick Beaudoin with Grid Arendal.

Opinion: Conversations Beyond Development

There are more ideas on earth than intellectuals imagine. And these ideas are more active, stronger, more resistant, more passionate than “politicians” think.

– Michel Foucault

In mid February, I had the privilege of spending time co-facilitating a short course entitled “Beyond Development: Living Well on a Diverse and Finite Planet” at Schumacher College in the UK. The premise of the course was to provide participants with a space to explore the concept of ‘development’ from different perspectives and experiences qualified by culture, ideology, geography, ways of knowing, etc.

Such explorations are a luxury in our high speed world and through them, groups are able to highlight vital insights necessary to enable change. And yet highlighting such insights is only a first step towards transforming our systems and societies from what is termed “unsustainable” to what is termed “sustainable”. More often than not, the inability to affect a desired change is not primarily related to any lack of knowledge, data, science, or even in a lack of good, viable solutions. Most often it’s related to a rather large elephant in the room that never seems to be talked about, even though its presence cannot be ignored: how power dynamics operate in key parts of the economic and development system.

The dominant global development paradigm is an inheritance from a time when European were sailing the seas, “discovering” new lands and laying colonial claims as part of an expansionary order. This geopolitical situation has been the main catalyst behind global economic and societal thinking and policy from about the 16th century to today. It continues to shape answers to questions like “what is progress?” and “what is development?” and has constrained humanity’s ability to explore the untapped potential of other possible pathways to what different individuals or groups define as ‘development’..

The Brazilian economist Celso Furtado criticised this dominant development paradigm. Furtado says this approach focuses on “abstract objectives such as investment, exports and growth” and ignores how different people and cultures have a broader definition of progress, fulfilment and happiness than these abstract objectives comprise. For example, assuming that wealth can only be defined in material and monetary terms, and that only ‘economic growth’ can move a society from ‘un-developed’ to ‘developed’, perpetuates simplistic thinking. It says that only one form of economic organization can address the challenge of development, at the expense of diversity in cultural, economic and political forms of organization. Geographic colonialism has metamorphosed into ‘development colonialism’ based on a co-dependent relationship between what is defined as the ‘rich’ world and the ‘poor’ world.

I do not pretend that this one paragraph can do this complex conversation justice. However it is one example of how, since the latter part of the 20th Century, an incredible innovation in thinking has led to a myriad of viable alternative solution pathways that would in the least shift away from the current, inadequate and essentially failing paradigm allowing for new potential to be realized.

The Beyond Development course offered a variety of alternatives through conceptual and real life examples that have the potential to create, and bring profound systemic change to how societies are defining and pursuing ‘development’. Some examples like Buen Vivir, economic Swaraj, feminist economics, Gross National Happiness, de-growth and many more examples could make an entire volume. Even in some of the countries that represent the temples of the current paradigms, new thinking and transformative action is visible at the macro scale (e.g. US states implementing Genuine Progress Indicators) and at local scales (UK communities experimenting with alternative currencies and Transition Town movements).

There is no doubt that whether one is working to enable change for a better environment, to reduce inequality, support social justice or other important societal change that currently lie at the fringes of the dominant paradigm, the flows of power in society need to be clearly identified . Our societal constructs are not built solely on technical, rational or emotionless building blocks. They come to be because we, as citizens, allow them to be. We imbue them with power. And as long as we choose to ignore the power dynamics in the systems we wish to transform, our incredible creative potential is rendered impotent. Our conversations and dialogues therefore need to change. We need to invite more genuine and frank sharing. We need everyone to be honest and truthful about their perspectives and interests. We need to avoid dogma and hubris in order to be fully inclusive of everyone who has a contribution to make and especially of those who may resist change.

Written by Yannick Beaudoin, Chief Scientist.

Posted by Cylvia Hayes at 10:46 am
Cylvia Hayes
Book Cylvia for upcoming events

Cylvia has over 20 years of professional experience in sustainable energy, economic development, workforce development, green building, waste prevention and sustainable forestry and agriculture.

Full Bio